<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ARRT Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2428/47456</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T18:14:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Improving Subject Teaching</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49613</link>
      <description>Title: Improving Subject Teaching
Authors: Millar, R; Leach, J; Osborne, J; Ratcliffe, M; Ametller, J; Bartholomew, H; Collins, S; Duschl, R; Hames, V; Hind, A; Lewis, J; Scott, P</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49613</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving the research-practice interface: the impact of research-informed teaching materials on science teachers' practices</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49536</link>
      <description>Title: Improving the research-practice interface: the impact of research-informed teaching materials on science teachers' practices
Authors: Millar, R; Hames, V
Description: The central issue addressed in this paper is the relationship between research and practice in science education. More specifically it explores the relationship between research on the learning of scientific ideas on the one hand, and classroom practices on the other. Much data has been collected in recent decades about students’ misconceptions, alternative ways of thinking and reasoning, and learning difficulties in many of the knowledge domains that are central to a scientific understanding of the natural world (see, for example, Driver et al., 1994; Pfundt &amp; Duit, 1994). The impact of this body of research on classroom practice, or on the design and sequencing of instruction, official curricula and programmes of study is, however, rather less than we (as researchers) might wish.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49536</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Teaching the nature of science in schools: what makes a lesson effective?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49553</link>
      <description>Title: Teaching the nature of science in schools: what makes a lesson effective?
Authors: Bartholomew, H; Osborne, J; Ratcliffe, M
Description: The study on which this paper draws is one project within an ESRC funded network looking at evidence-based practice in science education (EPSE), and is concerned with the teaching of 'ideas and evidence' in school science lessons. In an initial phase, a three round Delphi study (Dalkey et al. 1963) asked a panel of 23 individuals drawn from 5 communities with an interest in science education – scientists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science, science educators and science teachers – about aspects of the nature of science that they felt should be part of the compulsory school science curriculum.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49553</guid>
      <dc:date>2002-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Towards Evidence-Based Practice in Science Education</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49535</link>
      <description>Title: Towards Evidence-Based Practice in Science Education
Authors: Millar, R; Leach, J; Osborne, J; Ratcliffe, M
Description: This summarising statement looks at the activities, outcomes, highlights and achievements of the project Towards Evidence-based Practice in Science Education.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2428/49535</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

